The Failure of Japanese Whale Diplomacy: A Constructivist Analysis of Changes in International Norms
https://doi.org/10.55105/2658-6444-2025-1-119-149
Abstract
This research examines the failure of Japanese whale diplomacy following the International Whaling Commission’s (IWC) moratorium on commercial whaling in 1986, with a focus on Japan’s attempts to change the conservationist view of whales to the one focused on consumption of whale meat. This article explains how Japanese whale diplomacy attempts to convince the international public that whaling is part of cultural preservation. The method used is a qualitative approach with analysis of official government documents and research related to Japanese diplomacy and whaling. The constructivism approach was used to analyze how international identities, norms, and discourses shape Japan’s diplomatic policies.
The findings show that, despite Japan’s efforts to prove that whaling is safe and sustainable, it has failed to change international norms on whale conservation. The dominant international discourse continues to regard whaling as unethical and environmentally damaging. Significant resistance from other countries that support conservation was a major obstacle.
This research reveals that the failure of Japanese diplomacy was not only due to international resistance, but also Japan’s inability to align their scientific and cultural arguments with a global narrative that prioritizes environmental ethics. The contribution of this research lies in understanding the dynamics of norms and identities in international relations and the importance of ethical narratives in environmental diplomacy.
About the Authors
R. Imawan
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
IMAWAN Riswanda – Master student in Master Program in International Relations
. Surwandono
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
SURWANDONO – Lecturer
References
1. Acharya, A. (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization, 58 (02), 483–519. http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0020818304582024.
2. Barclay, K., and Epstein, C. (2013). Securing Fish for the Nation: Food Security and Governmentality in Japan. Asian Studies Review, 37 (2), 215–333. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10357823.2013.769498.
3. Berkowitz, H., and Grothe-Hammer, M. (2022). From a Clash of Social Orders to a Loss of Decidability in Meta-Organizations Tackling Grand Challenges: The Case of Japan Leaving the International Whaling Commission. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 115–138. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000079010/full/html.
4. Betsill, M. M. (2007). Reflections on the Analytical Framework and NGO Diplomacy. In NGO Diplomacy (pp. 177–206), The MIT Press. https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/3214/chapter/91655/Reflections-on-the-Analytical-Framework-and-NGO.
5. Butler-Stroud, C. (2016). What Drives Japanese Whaling Policy? Frontiers in Marine Science, 3 (JUN), 1–4. http://journal.frontiersin.org/Article/10.3389/fmars.2016.00102/abstract.
6. Caddell, R. (2014). Science Friction: Antarctic Research Whaling and the International Court of Justice. Journal of Environmental Law, 26 (2), 331–340.
7. Caddel, R. (2023). Marine Mammals and Migratory Species. In Research Handbook on International Marine Environmental Law (pp. 333–359), Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/book/9781789909081/book-part-9781789909081-24.xml.
8. Coady, D., Gogarty, B., and McGee, J. (2018). Scientific Whaling and How Philosophy of Science Can Help Break the International Deadlock. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 72 (1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1334758.
9. Cunningham, P. A., Huijbens, E. H., and Wearing, S. L. (2012). From Whaling to Whale Watching: Examining Sustainability and Cultural Rhetoric. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20 (1), 143–161. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09669582.2011.632091.
10. Danaher, M. (2002). Why Japan Will Not Give up Whaling. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change, 14 (2), 105–120.
11. Deitelhoff, N., and Zimmermann, L. (2018). Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Robustness of International Norms. International Studies Review, 22 (1), 51–76. https://academic.oup.com/isr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/isr/viy080/5266952.
12. Dippel, C. (2015). Foreign Aid and Voting in International Organizations: Evidence from the IWC. Journal of Public Economics, 132, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.08.012.
13. Dorsey, K. (2014). Whales and Nations: Environmental Diplomacy on the High Seas. Washington: University of Washington Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcwngrn.
14. Dorsey, K., and Cronon, W. (2014). Whales and Nations: Environmental Diplomacy on the High Seas. University of Washington Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=eNkYAgAAQBAJ.
15. Fielding, R. (2022). Whalers in ‘A Post-Whaling World’: Sustainable Conservation of Marine Mammals and Sustainable Development of Whaling Communities—With a Case Study from the Eastern Caribbean. Sustainability, 14 (14), 8782. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8782.
16. Finnemore, M., and Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52 (4), 887–917. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818398440608/type/journal_article.
17. Fitzmaurice, M. (2015). Whaling and International Law. Cambridge University Press. Gray, C. A., and Kennelly, S. J. (2018). Bycatches of Endangered, Threatened and Protected Species in Marine Fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 28 (3), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-018-9520-7.
18. Greenpeace. (2024). Save the Whales. Greenpeace. https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/oceans/save-the-whales/.
19. Harrell, A. M. (2020). Whaling in Japan: Conflicts and Controversies Surrounding a Dying Tradition. The Macksey Journal, 1, 185. https://mackseyjournal.scholasticahq.com/article/21871-whaling-in-japanconflicts-and-controversies-surrounding-a-dying-tradition.
20. Harris, P. G. (2022). Routledge Handbook of Marine Governance and Global Environmental Change. Routledge Handbook of Marine Governance and Global Environmental Change.
21. Hein, P. (2023). When Domestic Interests and Norms Undermine the Rules-Based Order: Reassessing Japan’s Attitude toward International Law. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8 (4), 895–922. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20578911231168206.
22. Holm, F. (2019a). After Withdrawal from the IWC: The Future of Japanese Whaling. Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 17 (4). https://apjjf.org/2019/04/holm.
23. Holm, F. (2019b). Japan’s Whaling Policy: The Reasons for Leaving the International Whaling Commission 1. In Japan 2019: Politik, Wirtschaft, Gesellschaft (November) (pp. 126–151). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337387724_Japan’s_Whaling_Policy_The_Reasons_for_Leaving_the_International_Whaling_Commission.
24. Holt, S. J. (1999). Whaling and International Law and Order. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 38 (7), 531–534. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0025326X98001544.
25. Imawan, R., Wirasenjaya, A. M., and Zhafran, M. Y. (2021). Japan’s Rejection of International Norms against Whaling” In M. Senge et al. (eds.), E3S Web of Conferences, 316, 04016. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131604016.
26. IWC. (2011). Chair’s Report of the 63rd Annual Meeting. https://archive.iwc.int/pages/download_progress.php?ref=66&size=&ext=pdf&k=.
27. IWC. (2024). Total Catches. International Whaling Commission. https://iwc.int/management-and-conservation/whaling/total-catches.
28. Japan Times. (2022). A Middle Way to Whaling. Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2002/05/22/editorials/a-middle-way-towhaling/.
29. Imawan R., Surwandono Japanese Whale Diplomacy Kagawa-Fox, M. (2009). Japan’s Whaling Triangle – The Power Behind the Whaling Policy. Japanese Studies, 29 (3), 401–414. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10371390903298078.
30. Kato, K. (2007). Prayers for the Whales: Spirituality and Ethics of a Former Whaling Community— Intangible Cultural Heritage for Sustainability. International Journal of Cultural Property, 14, 283–313.
31. Kojima, C. (2019). Japan’s Decision to Withdraw from the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy, 4, 93–96.
32. Kolmaš, M. (2020a). International Pressure and Japanese Withdrawal from the International Whaling Commission: When Shaming Fails. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75 (2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1799936.
33. Kolmaš, M. (2020b). When Shaming Fails: Japanese Withdrawal from the International Whaling Commission. Australia Institute of International Affairs. https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/whenshaming-fails-japanese-withdrawal-from-the-international-whalingcommission/.
34. Maruf, M., and Yen-Chiang Chang. (2023). Strengthening the Regulatory Framework for the Conservation of Cetaceans and Migratory Marine Species against Anthropogenic Underwater Noise. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 39 (1), 5–38. https://brill.com/view/journals/estu/39/1/article-p5_2.xml.
35. Mascia, M. B., and Mills, M. (2018). When Conservation Goes Viral: The Diffusion of Innovative Biodiversity Conservation Policies and Practices. Conservation Letters, 11 (3), 1–9. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12442.
36. Matsuoka, K. (2018). The Full Story Behind Japan’s Decision to Withdraw from the International Whaling Commission. Kodansha. https://gendai.media/articles/-/59221.
37. Mauad, A., and Betsill, M. (2019). A Changing Role in Global Climate Governance: São Paulo Mixing Its Climate and International Policies. Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 62 (2).
38. McCurry, J. (2021). Japan’s Whaling Town Struggles to Keep 400 Years of Tradition Alive. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/26/japans-whaling-town-struggles-to-keep-400-years-of-traditionalive.
39. Milstein, T., McGaurr, L., and Lester, L. (2021). Make Love, Not War?: Radical Environmental Activism’s Reconfigurative Potential and Pitfalls. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4 (2), 296–316. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2514848620901443.
40. MoFA. (2024). Japan and the Management of Whales. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/fishery/whales/japan.html.
41. NAMMCO. (2023). Report of the Scientific Committee Ad Hoc Working Group On Narwhal in East Greenland. https://nammco.no/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/report_negwg-2023.pdf.
42. Nomura, K. (2020). Antiwhaling Groups in Japan: Their Historical Lack of Development and Relationship With National Identity. The Journal of Environment & Development, 29 (2), 223–244. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1070496519878218.
43. Panigada, S. et al. (2024). Editorial: The ACCOBAMS Survey Initiative (ASI): Implementing Large Scale Surveys for Marine Megafauna in the Mediterranean and Black Seas. Frontiers in Marine Science, 11 (November), 10–12.
44. Papastavrou, V., and Ryan, C. (2023). Ethical Standards for Research on Marine Mammals. Research Ethics, 19 (4), 390–408. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17470161231182066.
45. Rayfuse, R., Jaeckel, A., and Klein, N. (2023). International Marine Environmental Law and Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.routledge.com/International-Marine-Environmental-Law-and-Policy/Hassan-Karim/p/book/9781138651135?srsltid=AfmBOoqpM6cncsADyUj_eqaR6yNx8a511CNp6Ci_aAkrxW75IHeeEd8V.
46. Rots, A. P., and Haugan, E. (2023). Whaling on Stage: A Comparison of Contemporary Japanese Whale Festivals. Religion, 53 (3), 528–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2023.2211393.
47. Sakaguchi, I. et al. (2021). Japan’s Environmental Diplomacy and the Future of Asia-Pacific Environmental Cooperation. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 21 (1), 121–156. https://academic.oup.com/irap/article/21/1/121/6024964.
48. Scholtz, W. (2019). Animal Welfare and International Enviromental Law: From Conservation to Compassion. Massachusetss: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1098855?ln=en.
49. Scott, S. V. (2014). Australia’s Decision to Initiate Whaling in the Antarctic: Winning the Case versus Resolving the Dispute. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68 (1), 1–16.
50. Scott, S. V., and Oriana, L. M. (2019). The History of Australian Legal Opposition to Japanese Antarctic Whaling. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 73 (5), 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2019.1639135.
51. Sea Shepherd. (2024). Whale Defense Campaign History. Sea Shepherd. https://www.seashepherdglobal.org/latest-news/whale-defense-campaignhistory/.
52. Sellheim, N. (2018). Quotas, Cultures, and Tensions. Recent Schedule Amendments for Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling under the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), 4–16.
53. Sellheim, N., and Morishita, J. (2023). Japan’s Withdrawal from International Whaling Regulation. London: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003250814.
54. Shutava, N. (2023). Japanese Whaling and the People Behind It. Routledge.
55. Simmonds, M. P., McLellan, F., Entrup, N., and Nunny, L. (2021). Whaling in Europe: An Ongoing Welfare and Conservation Concern. In Under Pressure: The Need to Protect Whales and Dolphins in European Waters (pp. 62–76). https://www.oceancare.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Animal_Species_Protection_Under-Pressure_Whales-and-Dolphins_EU_Report_OceanCare_EN_146p_2021.pdf.
56. Stoett, P. (2011). Irreconcilable Differences: The International Whaling Commission and Cetacean Futures. Review of Policy Research, 28 (6), 631–634. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00529.x.
57. Strand, J. R., and Tuman, J. P. (2012). Foreign Aid and Voting Behavior in an International Organization: The Case of Japan and the International Whaling Commission. Foreign Policy Analysis, 8 (4), 409–430. http://fpa.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00173.x.
58. Strausz, M. (2014). Executives, Legislatures, and Whales: The Birth of Japan’s Scientific Whaling Regime. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 14 (3), 455–478. https://academic.oup.com/irap/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/irap/lcu007.
59. Suisted, R., and Neale, D. M. (2004). Department of Conservation Marine Mammal Action Plan for 2005-2010. New Zealand Department of Conservation.
60. Tsubuku, M., and Brasor, P. (2019). In 2019, How Hungry Is Japan for Whale Meat? Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/01/11/business/future-whale-meat-consumption-japan/.
61. Wakamatsu, M., Kong Joo Shin, Wilson, C., and Managi, S. (2018). Exploring a Gap between Australia and Japan in the Economic Valuation of Whale Conservation. Ecological Economics, (October 2017), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.002.
62. Wakamatsu, M., Nakamura, H., and Managi, S. (2022). The Value of Whaling and Its Spatial Heterogeneity in Japan. Marine Policy, 135, 104852. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X21004632.
63. Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9780511612183A007/type/book_part.
64. Wold, C. (2020). Japan’s Resumption of Commercial Whaling and Its Duty to Cooperate with the International Whaling Commission. Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, 35 (1), 87–143.
65. Xu#, Jiaxin, Zhijia Liu, and Leslie, M. S. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of US and Japanese News Reports on Whaling Suggests Strategies to Improve Bilateral Communication on Commercial Whaling in Japan. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy, 25 (3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2022.2146847.
66. York, R. (2017). Why Petroleum Did Not Save the Whales. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 1–13. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2378023117739217.
Review
For citations:
Imawan R., Surwandono The Failure of Japanese Whale Diplomacy: A Constructivist Analysis of Changes in International Norms. Russian Japanology Review. 2025;8(1):119-149. https://doi.org/10.55105/2658-6444-2025-1-119-149
Views:
252
Email this article 