Russian Japanology Review

Advanced search

Collective Memory and Politics: ‘Comfort Women’ in Current Relations between South Korea and Japan

Full Text:


The article analyzes how the “comfort women” issue influences current relations between the Republic of Korea and Japan. In the early 20th century, Japan annexed Korea, and the memories of colonial-era humiliation are vivid in Korean collective consciousness. As a result, issues of the past often sour bilateral relations even today. Recently, Seoul has been actively pressing the issue of sexual slavery in Japanese military brothels, and differences over this seemingly irrelevant issue have impeded political and military cooperation. Articles on former sexual slaves (also called wianbu in Korean) have resurfaced time and again in Korean press throughout the 1940-80s, but the problem internationalized only in the 1990s, when a broad public discussion started. Although Japan maintains that the 1965 bilateral normalization resolved all issues of the past, Tokyo has several times offered official condolences and compensations to the victims, however Seoul found these steps or the tone thereof unsatisfactory. Most recently, in 2015, Abe Shinzō and Park Geunhye signed an agreement to close the wianbu issue, but the document irritated South Korean public and opposition, so Seoul abandoned it. President Moon Jaein, who came to power in 2017, continued this course and added pressure on related historical problems, such as Korean forced laborers in imperial Japan. As the crisis deepened, Tokyo introduced economic sanctions against South Korea (technically on unrelated grounds). Conflicts stemming from collective memory are a characteristic feature of North East Asian political culture. They are a popular tool in foreign and domestic policy of many countries. This, coupled with the irrational nature of nationalism and imperfection of regional security, makes issues of the past a very real threat to the present.

About the Author

I. V. Dyachkov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University)
Russian Federation


1. Arrington 2019 - Arrington, C. (2019). Japan claims it’s restricting exports to South Korea because of ‘national security.’ Here’s the real reason why, The Washington Post, July 18, 2019. (accessed: 25 July 2019).

2. Asmolov 2017 - Asmolov, K. (2017). Koreyskiye “zhenshchiny dlya utesheniya” i skandal s Pak Yu Kha [Korean “comfort women” and the Park Yu-ha scandal]. New Eastern Outlook, February 13, 2017. (accessed: 25 July 2019). (In Russian)

3. Choe 2018 - Choe, Sang-Hun. (2018). South Korea Signals End to ‘Final’ Deal With Japan Over Wartime Sex Slaves, The New York Times, November 21, 2018. (accessed: 25 July 2019).

4. Chosun Ilbo 2017 - Chosun Ilbo. (2017). Iljeongbu, ‘dokdosaeu·wianbuhalmeoni’ iteul yeonsok hangui 日정부, ‘독도새우·위안부할머니’ 이틀 연속 항의 [Japanese government protesting for 2 days against Dokdo shrimp and the wianbu granny]. (accessed: 25 July 2019). (In Korean)

5. Dyachkov 2013 - Dyachkov, I. (2013). Spor po povodu Tokto (Takesima): mezhdunarodno-politicheskoye izmereniye natsionalizma v SVA [Dispute over Dokdo (Takeshima): international political dimension of nationalism in North East Asia]. In XVII Nauchnaya konferentsiya koreyevedov Rossii i stran SNG «Koreya: uroki istorii i vyzovy sovremennosti» [17th scholarly conference of Russian and CIS Koreanologists “Korea: lessons from history and modern challenges]. Moscow: Institute of Far Eastern Studies of RAS, 102-112. (In Russian).

6. Gil 2015 - Gil, Yun-hyung. (2015). Did S. Korea operate “comfort stations” in the Vietnam War? Hankyoreh, April 25, 2015. (accessed: 25 July 2019).

7. Gukga beomnyeong jeongbo senteo 1965 - Gukga beomnyeong jeongbo senteo [National Law Information Center] (1965). Daehanmingukgwa ilbongukganui jaesan mit cheonggugwone gwanhan munjeui haegyeolgwa gyeongjehyeomnyeoge gwanhan hyeopjeong 대한민국과 일본국간의 재산 및 청구권에 관한 문제의 해결과 경제협력에 관한 협정 [Agreement between the Republic of Korea and Japan on resolving problems pertaining to property, claims and economic cooperation]. (accessed: 25 July 2019). (In Korean)

8. Hein 2016 - Hein, P. (2016). Unresolved Comfort Women Issue: How Pragmatism Precludes Reconciliation. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 14 (3), 447-460.

9. Heonbeop jaepanso 2011 - Heonbeop jaepanso [Constitutional Court of Korea] (2011). - Daehanmingukgwa ilbongukganui jaesan mit cheonggugwone gwanhan munjeui haegyeolgwa gyeongjehyeomnyeoge gwanhan hyeopjeong jesamjo bujagwi wiheonhwagin 대한민국과 일본국간의 재산 및 청구권에 관한 문제의 해결과 경제협력에 관한 협정 제 3 조부작위 위헌확인 [Confirmation of unconstitutionality of inaction upon article 3 of the Agreement between the Republic of Korea and Japan on resolving problems pertaining to property, claims and economic cooperation]. (accessed: 25 July 2019). (In Korean)

10. Howard (ed.) 1995 - Howard, K. (ed.) (1995). True Stories of the Korean Comfort Women. London: Cassell.

11. Kim 2014 - Kim, M. (2014). Memorializing Comfort Women: Memory and Human Rights in Korea-Japan Relations. Asian Politics and Policy, 6 (1), 83-96.

12. Kim 2019 - Kim, Sehyeong (2019). Munjaein-abe ssaum, teureompeu nuguson deureojulkka 문재인-아베 싸움, 트럼프 누구손 들어줄까? [Who will Trump support in Moon-Abe conflict], Maeil Business. (accessed: 25 July 2019). (In Korean)

13. Lee 2015 - Lee, C.Y. (2015). The Deafening Silence of the Korean “Comfort Women”: A Response Based on Lyotard and Ingaray, Asian Journal of Law and Society, 2 (2): 339-356.

14. Lee 2016 - Lee, B. (2016). South Korea-Japan Comfort Women Agreement: Where Do We Go From Here? The Diplomat. (accessed: 25 July 2019).

15. Lobov 2015 - Lobov, R. (2015). Podgotovka i podpisaniye Dogovora ob osnovakh otnosheniy mezhdu Respublikoy Koreya i Yaponiyey [Drafting and signing the treaty on framework of relations between the Republic of Korea and Japan]. In Koreya: 70 let posle osvobozhdeniya [Korea: 70 years since liberation]. Moscow: IDV RAN. (In Russian)

16. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan 1993 - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (1993). Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono on the result of the study on the issue of “comfort women”, August 4, 1993. (accessed: 25 July 2019).

17. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan 2015 - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (2015) Announcement by Foreign Ministers of Japan and the Republic of Korea at the Joint Press Occasion, December 28, 2015. (accessed: 25 July 2019).

18. Moon 1997 - Moon, K.H.S. (1997). Sex Among Allies: Military Prostitution in U.S.-Korea Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.

19. Moon 2015 - Moon, K.H.S. (2015). South Korea’s Demographic Changes and their Political Impact. Washington: Brookings.

20. Nozaki 2005 - Nozaki, Y. (2005). The “Comfort Women” Controversy: History and Testimony, The Asia-Pacific Journal, 3 (7). (accessed: 25 July 2019).

21. Piper 2001 - Piper, N. (2001). Transnational Women’s Activism in Japan and Korea: the Unresolved Issue of Military Sexual Slavery. Global Networks, 1 (2), 155-170.

22. Soh 2008 - Soh, C.S. (2008). The Comfort Women: Sexual Violence and Postcolonial Memory in Korea and Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

23. The Asia-Pacific Journal 2015 - The Asia-Pacific Journal (2015). Reexamining the “Comfort Women” Issue. An Interview with Yoshimi Yoshiaki, 13 (1, 1). (accessed: 25 July 2019).

24. Time 2018 - Time (2018). Osaka Severs Ties With San Francisco Over ‘Comfort Women’ Memorial. (accessed: 25 July 2019).

25. Toloraya (ed.) 2015 - Toloraya, G. (ed.). (2015). Nespokoynoye sosedstvo: problemy Koreyskogo poluostrova i vyzovy dlya Rossii [Uneasy neighbors: Korean Peninsula problems and challenges for Russia]. Moscow: MGIMO University. (In Russian)

26. Torkunov, Rotfeld (eds.) 2010 - Torkunov, A., Rotfeld, M. (eds.). (2010). Belyye pyatna - chernyye pyatna: Slozhnyye voprosy v rossiysko-pol’skikh otnosheniyakh [White spots - black spots: complicated issues in Russo-Polish relations]. Moscow: Aspekt-Press. (In Russian).

27. United Nations Commission on Human Rights 1996 - United Nations Commission on Human Rights (1996). Report on the mission to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea and Japan on the issue of military sexual slavery in wartime, January 4, 1996. (accessed: 25 July 2019).

28. United States House of Representatives 2007 - United States House of Representatives (2007) A resolution expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Government of Japan should formally acknowledge, apologize, and accept historical responsibility in a clear and unequivocal manner for its Imperial Armed Forces’ coercion of young women into sexual slavery, known to the world as “comfort women”, during its colonial and wartime occupation of Asia and the Pacific Islands from the 1930s through the duration of World War II. July 30, 2007. https:// (accessed: 25 July 2019).

29. Varga 2009 - Varga, A. (2009). National Bodies: The ‘Comfort Women’ Discourse and its Controversies in South Korea. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 2 (2), 287-303.

30. Wöhr 2006 - Wöhr, U. (2006). A Touchstone for Transnational Feminism: Discourses on the Comfort Women in 1990s Japan. Japanstudien, 16 (1): 59-90.

31. Yoshikata 2015 - Yoshikata, V. (2015). ‘Comfort Women’ Denial and the Japanese Right. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 13 (30, 2). (accessed: 25 July 2019).


For citations:

Dyachkov I.V. Collective Memory and Politics: ‘Comfort Women’ in Current Relations between South Korea and Japan. Russian Japanology Review. 2020;3(2):68-87. (In Russ.)

Views: 654

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2658-6444 (Print)
ISSN 2658-6789 (Online)