Connecting Fantasy Worlds and Nostalgia: Miyazaki Gorō’s Animation Movies
https://doi.org/10.55105/2658-6444-2022-1-111-133
Abstract
In the particular context of post-Cold War Japanese animation, the name of Miyazaki Gorō 宮崎 吾朗 (born 1967) is mostly related to the name of his illustrious father, Miyazaki Hayao 宮崎 駿 (born 1942). Professionally speaking, Miyazaki Gorō is a landscaper (construction consultant in the planning and designing of parks and gardens) as well as an animation director of two animation movies and one TV animation series. This paper focuses on the two animation movies released by Studio Ghibli under Miyazaki Gorō’s direction: Tales from the Earthsea (ゲド戦記 Gedo senki, 2006) and From Up On Poppy Hill (コクリコ坂から Kokuriko-zaka kara, 2011). Miyazaki Gorō’s two animation movies are described and analyzed, both as ideological manifestos continuing and, from a certain point onward, transcending what might be called the “Ghibli paradigm” and as aesthetical masterworks combining the “Ghibli paradigm” with fresh visions of employing animation as a medium, exploring, absorbing and integrating influences from beyond geographical boundaries and striving to break the “Japanese” limitations of the artistic language utilized in his approach to animated expressive modes.
About the Author
M. M. Grajdian
Hiroshima University
Japan
Japan
Grajdian, Maria Mihaela – PhD (Musicology), Associate Professor of Media Studies & Cultural Anthropology, Hiroshima University, Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences.
Hiroshima.
References
1. Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Bauman, Z. (2001a). Community – Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge; Oxford: Polity Press.
3. Bauman, Z. (2001b). The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1979). La Distinction – Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Éditions de Minuit. (In French).
5. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter – On the discursive limits of “sex”. London; New York: Routledge.
6. Castells, M. (1997). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture II: The Power of Identity. Oxford; Malden (Massachusetts): Blackwell Publishers.
7. Clements, J. (2018). Anime – A History. London; New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
8. Clements, J. & McCarthy, H. (2017). The Anime Encycopledia – A Century of Japanese Animation. Berkeley: Stone Bridge Press.
9. Condry, J. (2013). The Soul of Anime: Collaborative Creativity and Japan’s Media Success Story. Durham: Duke University Press.
10. Davis, F. (1979). Yearning for Yesterday – A Sociology of Nostalgia. London; New York: Macmillan Press.
11. Eagleton, T. (2003). After Theory. New York: Basic Books.
12. Fielding, J. R. (2008). Discovering World Religions at 24 Frames per Second. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
13. Foucault, M. (1969). L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard. (In French).
14. Fuller, M. (2007). Media Ecologies – Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture. Cambridge (Massachusetts); London: MIT Press.
15. Fuller, M. & Goffey, A. (2012). Evil Media. Cambridge (Massachusetts); London: MIT Press.
16. Giddens, A. (2020). The Third Way – The Renewal of Social Democracy. Oxford: Polity Press.
17. Grajdian, M. (2008). Das japanische Anime: Versuch einer wissenschaftlichen Annäherung. Sibiu: Lucian Blaga University Press. (In German).
18. Grajdian, M. (2019). Cyberspaces of Loneliness: Love, Masculinity, Japan. Bucharest: ProUniversitaria Press.
19. Kristeva, J. (1974). La Révolution du langage poétique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. (In French).
20. Kristeva, J. (1989). Étrangersànous-mêmes. Paris: Éditions Fayard. (In French).
21. Lamarre, T. (2009). The Anime Machine: A Media Theory of Animation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22. Lamarre, T. (2018). The Anime Ecology – A Genealogy of Television, Animation, and Game Media. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.
23. Luhmann, N. (1996). Die Realität der Medien. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. (In German).
24. Mcquail, D. (2012). Mass Communication Theory – An Introduction. London; Beverly Hills; New Delhi: Sage Publications.
25. Miegel, M. (2005). Epochenwende: Gewinnt der Westen die Zukunft? Berlin: Propyläen Press. (In German).
26. Miyazaki, G. (2004). Mitaka no mori Jiburi Bijutsukan zuroku [The Image Book of Ghibli Museum in Mitaka Forest]. Tokyo: Tokuma Foundation for Anime Culture. (In Japanese).
27. Miyazaki, G. (2012). Satsuki to Mei no ie no tsukurikata [The construction method of Satsuki & Mei’s House]. Tokyo: Ghibli Studio/Tokuma Press. (In Japanese).
28. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Succeed in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs Press.
29. Odell, C. & Le Blanc, M. (2009). Studio Ghibli: The Films of Hayao Miyazaki and Isao Takahata. Harpenden: Kamera Books.
30. Ōtsuka, E. (2004). ‘Dentō’ to wa nani ka? [What is ‘tradition’?]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shinsho. (In Japanese).
31. Peterson, J. B. (1999). Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief. London; New York: Routledge.
32. Sugimoto, Y. (2013). An Introduction to Japanese Society. Cambridge; New York; Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
33. Suzuki, A. (2008). Animating the Chaos: Contemporary Japanese Anime, Cinema and Postmodernity. Ann Arbor: ProQuest.
34. Suzuki, T. (2018). Mixing Work with Pleasure: My Life at Studio Ghibli. Translated by Roger Spears. Tokyo: Japan Library.
35. Takahata, I. (2013). “Taiyō no ōji: Horusu no daibōken” kara “Kaguya-hime no monogatari” made [From “The Prince of Sun: Horus’ Great Adventure” until “The Tale of Princess Kaguya”]. Tokyo, Kinema-Junpōsha. (In Japanese).
36. Thomas, J. B. (2012). Drawing on Tradition: Manga, Anime and Religion in Contemporary Japan. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
37. Turner, V. (1968). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
38. Wells, P. (1998). Understanding Animation. London; New York: Routledge Press.
39. Žižek, S. (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London; New York: Verso.
Review
For citations:
Grajdian M.M. Connecting Fantasy Worlds and Nostalgia: Miyazaki Gorō’s Animation Movies. Russian Japanology Review. 2022;5(1):111-133. https://doi.org/10.55105/2658-6444-2022-1-111-133
Views: 506
Email this article 